Regarding Mono project

Jeff explained to me on IRC how the mention of Mono in my last blog entry the way I put it, gives people the impression that I implied mono has anything to do with the issue. I really didn't mean to imply that so I am very sorry for causing this confusion. Now that I am writing this , I will make it very clear for the record that I do not have anything against the mono project. Quite on the contrary, I am extremely impressed by this great project and the service it has done for the Free Software world. Microsoft supporting the development of a Free Software project, never thought we'll ever achieve this but Miguel and his great team of hackers have made that possible.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What do you then think about Microsofts warnings with regards to patents ... do you think Mono has anything to do with that? And if not, what do you think they are talking about with those patents?
January 27, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Anonymous said…
MS is the one getting sued, not the one doing the suing. I expect that patent lawsuits targeting Microsoft is a bi-monthly occurrence.

Microsoft may blow hard about patents occasionally, but so far nobody has been actually taken to court over anything...

I really doubt that Microsoft would be in a position to be threatening anybody.

After all, now all their major customers (these being OEMs and large businesses) are actually using and supporting Linux. So that would put Microsoft in a position of going after their own customers.

Think about IBM, Dell, HP, and all the top500 companies. All of them make significant money from Linux and Open Source as well use it themselves. All those are people that Microsoft needs to work with to survive.

Plus I expect courts would take a very dim view of Microsoft suing the users of a project that was developed fully in the open, with full knowledge from Microsoft, with people from the project interacting with Microsoft the entire time, and with Microsoft's occasional support (Silverlight/Moonlight).

I don't know all the ins and outs of patent laws, but I expect letting a project get very far that was fully open and transparent and interacting with you, and waiting for it to become a established part of somebody else's OS.. then suing them for it will have a severely negative effect on the sort of awards and punishments a court will be willing to give out.

--------------------------


In fact the only questionable part of Mono, IMO (not a lawyer at all), is when Mono tries to impliment things that are outside the C# specification and are Microsoft technologies.

Things like Winforms compatibility or any other otherwise Windows-specific API.

But as far as I can tell no Mono program that Gnome uses or any other Linux distribution or program uses has Windows-oriented stuff in there. It's all Linux-specific with GTK bindings and that sort of thing.

So as long as people stick to the C# and Linux specific stuff for hacking on Linux programs then I don't see any threat coming out of Microsoft.

Just a personal non-expert opinion. It makes sense to me.

----------------------

It's not that I trust Microsoft.

Well I trust Microsoft.. I trust Microsoft to act in their own best interest.

So when things like Silverlight comes along I figure they are trustworthy because Linux folks and Microsoft both want similar things... they both would like to replace proprietary Flash.

Microsoft with their own proprietary flash, and Linux with the open source one.

So that when Microsoft sees that by supporting OSS Moonlight they can go a long way to help reduce Adobe's Flash influence, then I can trust them in that specific case.

After all, they have nothing to lose in the deal. If they don't support OSS then that vastly reduces the chances of replacing Flash any time soon, and then Linux still has a decent online experience because Adobe Flash works fine in Linux.

If they do support OSS and if that helps replace Adobe Flash then Linux still would have a decent online experience, but at least online developers would be able to use and purchase Microsoft-specific tools to program in Silverlight. (I expect Microsoft feels they can out compete OSS folks in the quality of development tools for Silverlight so they see no danger from that angle)

That's a Win-Win for both sides.


(Of course, I am hoping that the next-gen Javascript engines coming from Apple, Google, and Mozilla, are going to displace proprietary or otherwise plugin-specific languages for highly dynamic web applications and animations/multimedia stuff.)
January 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM
Gabriel Burt said…
Though Moonlight 2.0 will use Mono (Moonlight 1.0 doesn't), they are separate projects.

@Shawn: See http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing
January 27, 2009 at 4:46 PM
Anonymous said…
I don't think anyone at all interpreted the last entry that way.
January 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Anonymous said…
Taken straight out of "Excuses for Politicians 101"? Sounds pretty much exactly like every time some public person says the truth by accident and then have to apologize just like, well, this.
January 27, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Yevgen Muntyan said…
"last thing we need is some random mono-hacker who doesn't even know why a sound server is needed"

"Quite on the contrary, I am extremely impressed by this great project and the service it has done for the Free Software world"

Yeah, right.
January 27, 2009 at 9:07 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to the virtual world!

Image
About two months ago I informed  the followers of this blog that I will now be working on SPICE project  for Red Hat . Judging from the questions I was asked after that, I realized that not many people know about SPICE so I thought I write at least one blog entry dedicated to explaining what SPICE is all about. Before I get to SPICE itself, let me first introduce you to the world SPICE lives in. Virtualization and Virtual Machines (VMs) For some reason, I feel that I should leave the definitions to wikipedia  and only quote it so that is what I am going to do: " Virtualization, in computing, is the creation of a virtual (rather than actual) version of something, such as a hardware platform, operating system, a storage device or network resources. " " A virtual machine (VM) is a "completely isolated operating system installation within your normal operating system".Today, this is implemented by either software emulation or hardware virtualization ". V...
Read more

clutter-gst

After I was informed about the existence of ClutterGstVideoSink, I quickly modified my super-video application to make it use that. But as soon as i did that, i stopped getting even the static image. After careful analysis for days, I figured that I was supposed to call gst_bus_add_signal_watch() on the pipeline bus since ClutterGstVideoSink uses messages on the bus combined with signal handlers to render the frames in the application thread. This is obviously a 'dirty' hack; a hack because gst elements are supposed to do all the media processing in the pipeline thread, dirty because gst bus is not meant for media transport. After this realization, I had been working on it from time to time. First I tried to make the actual rendering happen in the gst pipeline thread by using the clutter's thread safety primitives and that worked quite nicely in the end except for one minor problem: The call to clutters rendering thread blocks if it happens after the clutter main loop has b...
Read more

Shame Ubuntu shame

I am no more a fan of Ubuntu. The reason is their recent demonstration of lack of community spirit. Here is the release announcement of Ubuntu hardy alpha6. If you scroll-down you can see the gnome-system-monitor's new cool "Resources" view featured with a nice screenshot. Since Karl-Lattimer worked really hard to make this happen, he asked to be given personal credit on that page. Don't know about others but I see this as a very reasonable thing to ask. The result of this request can be seen in the announcement of hardy beta. They just removed the feature from the announcement. Shame Ubuntu shame. UPDATE: It's interesting how most of the comments that are from people who got pissed without actually caring to understand the main point of this blog entry (which me and Karl-Lattimer tried to emphasize in the comments) are posting as Anonymous. :) Acknowledging the possibility that they might not think comments are worth reading before commenting, let me make it c...
Read more